and those are the links that stand the test of time Matt Cutts, Google
16 years of link building strategy, commentary and advice to behold if you are wise, or scoff at if you prefer to be filthy godless pigs.
.Follow LinkMoses aka Eric Ward
.Subscribe to LinkMoses, now Link Building Best Practices
Who is this LinkMoses?
Is White Hat Linking a Myth?
by Eric Ward
Last week's Link Whore firestorm really has me in deep thought, and that's always painful.
At what point does a link-building tactic make the leap from acceptable to not? When does white hat become black hat? Or gray hat? Or pink?
And who is to say what is acceptable and what isn't? What works is what's acceptable, and vice-versa, right? It's not your fault blog comment spam got out of control. It's the other guy. If he'd stop link farming so would I. Ok. Sure. I give.
I think the whole white hat / black hat link-building and SEM argument clouds the larger point. Appropriate link building tactics will be different depending on the site you are seeking links for. This site needs a different approach than this one. Your link pursuits should always be driven by your content, and yes, I agree sometimes your content can even be driven by link opportunities, though that's a slippery slope.
In its most simplest terms: to me white hat link building means the links you seek are not being sought for organic search rank improvement. This does not mean you can't improve your search rank via that approach, but that it's a residual effect, icing on the cake, if you will.
If I can go Miyagi on you for a moment, I would say "high rank is the by-product of content judged well, then well linked". But this isn't all. Even non-SEO links can be spam and make the web an uglier place. "Intent" is at the core of the white hat / black hat debate. Why do you want that link? Answer that queston honestly and you'll see why I wrote last week's post.
The sad downside of the algorithmic link analysis is that when combined with increased user generated content and links, the intent of the linker can no longer be trusted. So links today are becoming like meta tags 10 years ago. Anything goes as long as it gets me traffic, right?
Nope. Not for me.
So, either I don't get it, or you don't. I'll bet on myself, and let's see who ranks for link building expert in a few years.
|About the Author|
|Eric Ward founded the Web's first service for announcing, linking, and buildng buzz for Web sites, back in 1994. His client list is a who's who of online brands. Ward is best known as the person behind the linking campaigns for Amazon.com Books, Weather.com, The Link Exchange, Rodney Dangerfield (Rodney.com), the AMA, and PBS.org. His services won the 1995 Award For Internet Marketing Excellence, and he was selected as one of the Web's 100 most influential people by Websight magazine. Eric is a 4-star speaker at Search Engine Marketing conferences, and he has written online marketing advice columns for everyone from SearchEngineLand to MarketingProfs to ClickZ to Ad Age magazine. Learn more about Eric and his content publicity and link building services at ericward.com|
site has great content but nobody links to it
Eric follows the right approach Matt Cutts, Google
Eric Ward.com|Link Building Best Practices|Linking Strategy Session|All Services|Contact