|
|||
Commentary, articles, and tips on building links, publicity and buzz All posts & articles | LinkMoses feed. | Link Building and Content Publicity Services | Why LinkMoses? |
|
|
| Link Popularity and the Myth of the Guestbook
Link
by Eric Ward, aka LinkMoses Original: April 2003 Updated: Feb04, Nov06 You have probably been to a site that had a section called a "Guestbook". Many sites ask you to "sign their guestbook", and many of these guestbooks also permit HTML code in the guestbook comments, meaning you or I or anyone can visit guestbooks on web sites all day long and systematically create links back to our sites from hundreds of other site's guestbooks. Naturally, some web marketers (probably the ones that think exit pop-ups are useful) think that by signing guestbooks and adding links by the hundreds they will improve their link popularity scores at search engines. Before you get excited and do a Google search on the phrase "sign our guestbook" (3.4 million as of 11/06 BTW) and head off like a link monkey, here's my take on the whether guestbook links are valid, ignored, or penalized, and if they have any impact on the success of a web site's link popularity. links truly have? How about none? Guestbook links are really no different than FFA links, if you think about it. FFA (Free For All) pages are pages where a link can be obtained by anyone (even a script) without human intervention, meaning no person even looks to see if the requesting site has any decent content. Such link lists are obviously useless. Ask yourself when was the last time you went to a FFA link list to find a useful web site. How about never? And since ANY site owner could do the same thing--sign a thousand guestbooks--how much credibility can such links truly have? None. If I run a site that sells snake oil I can spend my days signing the guestbooks of the best sites on the web and leech some link popularity from them? Nope. The real question here is do search engines know about this scam yet, or do they count guestbook links as additional links for poplarity rankings? My hunch is that since guestbook links are not in any way an indication of content quality, then they do not matter at all. If ANY search engine currently gives any credit or rankings impact for guestbook links, this impact is only because the engine hasn't yet figured out the guestbook trick, and soon will. In fact, since the majority of guestbooks pages have the word guestbook in the URL string, it would be absurdly easy for the search engines to simply ignore any link that appears at any URL with the letters guestbook in it. And I'll bet you if they don't already ignore them they will soon. My last point is more philosophical. If the reason you are seeking a link is because a). The link can be obtained automatically or in bulk numbers and b). You are trying to inflate links for SEO purposes, then the bottom line is it's all bullsh*t, and no matter if the engines figure it out today or next month, the tactic is based on a lie and shouldn't be done. Link well my friend, -LM |
| About the Author |
Eric
Ward founded the Web's first services for announcing, linking, and
building buzz for Web sites, called NetPOST,
in 1994, and in 1995 he launched the URLwire
Site Announcement Network, which today has millions of readers
and remains the only service devoted 100% to announcing useful web content.
Eric is best known as the person behind the first linking campaigns for
Amazon.com,
Rodney.com,
and PBS.org. His services won the 1995
Award For Internet Marketing Excellence, and he was selected as one
of the Web's 100 most influential people by Websight Magazine in
1997. Eric is a 4-star speaker at Jupiter's Search Engine Strategies conferences,
and he publishes a monthly how-to newsletter called THE
WARD REPORT: Link Building and Content Publicity Tactics.
Eric writes online marketing advice columns for Web
Marketing Today and MarketingProfs,
and previously for ClickZ.com
and Ad Age magazine. Eric, his wife Melissa and toddler
Noah live in Knoxville, Tennessee.
|