SMX East - New York
 

SMX Boot Camp: 
Link Building Fundamentals

Monday, October 5th
3:45pm-5:00pm

Eric Ward - EricWard.com


Link Building Lore...

In 1993 nobody cared about link building

There were just a few crawler based search engines, like Wandex and ALIWEB, directories like Yahoo, and a few places where people could announce web sites, like the NCSA What's New page and Open Market's What's New. There was no "link analysis", no link popularity and no Pagerank, because there was no Google.  Search Engine Optimization had nothing to do with link building, and link building was practiced by just a handful of folks like myself. On 286's with modems. 


Link Building In 2009  - Everybody cares, but why?


Link Building = Pagerank = Search Rank, Right?
We have hundreds of tools and tactics for building links, search rank, publicity, and "buzz".

Aside from the typical links page, we have blogs, social bookmarking, social networks, tagging sites, collaborative popularity sites (digg, newsvine), toolbars and plugins (StumbleUpon),  press release services, web directories, link buying services, linking management tools. 

We also have sites being penalized for linking tactics they didn't realize were dangerous, and we have companies all over the world claiming expertise and selling linking related services which are 100% useless.


 

The Big Change:

PageRank - http://www.google.com/technology/

Links have become the online "currency of the realm",
and now serve multiple purposes and audiences

What Is Link Popularity?

Links as Citations


Audiences for your links:

You have two audiences for your links:

1). People who click them
2). Search Engines that judge them
 

Currently, most people are seeking links hoping the search engines will reward them for those links with higher rankings.  While this is potentially true, not every site should approach link building the same way, and the overwhelming majority of sites are pursuing ineffective linking strategies.


 Link Type and Link Value:

Links can accomplish four things:

1). Direct click traffic
Links that help with direct click traffic often generate temporary buzz, like Yahoo New and Notable or links from social venues like Twitter, or Digg, or paid even links and email.  Sometimes these links can help search rank as well, which makes people do some pretty silly things

A couple additional comments about Twitter and link building.  I've posted a case study on the positive effect of what I call Twitter Link Waves.  Also read Twitter: Incredibly Valuable Or Utterly Useless As A Link Building Tool?

2). Search rank
Links that help search rank will be earned by content merit, originate from source sites engines trust, and be put in place by people who could be described as "curators of quality".  This is what I mean when I refer to a link as a citation.  Here's a great example of a citation based merit earned link.  Your niche's trusted sources are different than the person sitting next to you.

3). Both
A link that can help rank and send direct click traffic is a rare and beautiful thing.  I'd show you a few hundred of these but I've worked 14 years to identify and build rapport with them.  I'm old, not stupid.

4). Neither
A link that can neither help rank or send direct click traffic is a common and useless thing,and in my opinion, 99% of the web is just this, due to the low cost of entry onto the web.

Links can help direct click traffic but not affect search rank
Links can affect search rank (higher or lower)
Links can do both
Links can do neither
 

Effective link building involves multiple strategies, including
Low hanging fruit - the links anyone can get
Merit based from link "curators" - links only you can get
Online public relations
Non-sensationalist linkbait
Click traffic driven link buying aka advertising
On-site link optimization
However...
The link building approach used for any given web site should be different based on each site's focus, content, and intended audience

Target site value..."That which is different"

What is a high value link target for this site?

http://www.stormwaterauthority.org

Would it be a link from some web directory like this
Would it be links (citation) from topically relevant and editorially vetted sites like

http://www.mass.gov/dep/service/others02.htm

http://erf.org/links.html

These last two link targets make sense for the above site, but...

What is a high value link target for this site?

Is it a link from a site that's devoted to upcoming movie releases, like this
Is it a link from a site like digg that then points to an "offical" site ?
Is it a link from a Yahoo fan/discussion list for Tim Burton ?
Is it a link from a Wikipedia Article ?
 

The point bears restating
The most effective link building aka "citation seeking" strategies for any web site must be based on that site's unique features, focus, function, intent, and merit.
Tools - A Big Roundup Of Link Building Tools By Debra
.

Closing thoughts
  • Since the linking approach required for any given web site will vary dramatically depending on that site's focus, content, and intended audience, then each site deserves it's own link building and content publicity plan or blueprint.  
  • Links tell a story about a site, like a transcript or "rap-sheet"
  • Engines use that story to make decisions about your site
  • In general, the easier any link is to obtain, the less useful that link is likely to be (for a person or a search engine)
  • The future of links - my Michelangelo/Pollock theory, and a reminder about 

    "That which is different